• ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There was an interesting discussion on Radio 4 the other day that suggested you could release a lot more female prisoners because they tended to not be in for violent or sexual crimes. It would make less tabloid headlines and clear a prison or two.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course, just releasing prisoners based on crime and & how much of the assigned sentence is served. Has exactly the same effect. Without any ability to accuse of prejudice.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They weren’t suggesting just releasing women as that would be an issue.

        Of course, if you are releasing people for offences were drink, drugs or mental health may have contributed, then you need a better support mechanism or they’ll boomerang straight back inside. Another reason a holistic approach is needed. It’s why cutting the money going to social work, mental health services, etc, etc is not a saving.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not just that kind of support. Just releasing people isn’t good either. For one thing, they need places to live, and help finding work, etc.

          I hope this is going to happen along side a bunch of resources going to the services which support people after release. Otherwise this is going to go very wrong as you suggest.

    • Five@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wonder if publishing leaked US military helicopter footage and violating the UK Bail Act would have been crimes worthy of release.