…every NEW home…

Stay strong brother. There’s dozens of us.

Making a statement about Oct 7th doesn’t make a negative statement about the rest of the war. Neither is omitting to say something a statement.

You’re inferring what you’re assuming his position is and it helps noone.

People are so amped up that’s it’s impossible to discuss certain topics with being willfully misunderstood. All to assign people a side in the conflict.

🎉🎈🎊🎇

0.1%

Crisis averted.

Just learn the basic POSIX commands (there’s probably 20-25) and understand pipes. Then you can do pretty much anything you’re likely to need from the command line. Sure, there will be more modern flashy friendly tools that come along. Some you’ll integrate into what you do. Some won’t have enough staying power to remember.

No notes. No googling or LLM. Just don’t skip to the end.

As a shareholder he has no say in that. The company directors say how much dividend is paid, and he is no longer one of them.

Honestly, I think people only want to hear the hateful version and aren’t interested in even considering that somebody is trying to broach a sensitive subject that needs to be discussed.

How about we get past our preconceptions and try to work the problems out. No? Guess we all fucked then.

That is only in some countries and not the UK.

Only in the form of dividends, if brewdog pays them.

People know that a sub-community is like a subset. A smaller part of the larger community. Not a lower class of people.

Right?

Seems like it really should be down at number 8.

Oooh. A birther conspiracy all of our own!

4. Labour are communicating their plan to the public really badly. All we hear is cut, cut, cut but nothing about what those cuts will enable them to do. There no positive narrative.

If you remove the buzzword AI and replace it with “statistical analysis of big data sets” I have a much easier time with this.

If he’s talking about LLMs, we’re fucked.

This was always my fear when I read the Labour manifesto. All the way through they identified the right problems that needed solving, but the solutions were all bandwagon jumping buzzword bingo. There was no understanding of the solution being suggested. You could just tell that they were repeating things out of some lobbyists mouth.

One problem is medical / life insurance firms. If they use the data to identify correlations (real or spurious) then they might make insurance unaffordable or just flat out refuse it to certain sectors.

Not everyone is looking for medical solutions.

Seems to be a number of stories making up possible things that can be said now that “fact-checkers” are gone. It’s all fabricated outrage as it’s all hypotheticals.

Personally I’m happy to see the back of them. No corporation should be in a position of defining truth.

I can see lots of subtle bugs coming from this.

Develop and everything working great. Deploy on server with different HWCaps and you’re now running different code.

The signatories added: “We have seen no meaningful steps taken towards democratising the party, which we were promised.”

They really are gullible, aren’t they?