

While i agree.
This whole article is based on nothing but gueaes and suspicion.
China has no duty or moral obligation to run british steel infrastructure at a loss. And if the UK wants to keep the plants running (at £700k a day while not being able to sell that ateel. Its rather presumptuous to expect chinese companies to do it when UK ones were nott able to do so profitably.
Nationalise and accept that is the cost of keepinflg a steel inferstructure when most of the developed world is also so and selling steel cheap.
Anything else is expecting china to fund our steel at a loss to their own.
It was a dumb choice to start with. We pay now.
That inflated panic started.
When a Chinese company refused to work with the UK gov to keep a plant they own running. Even when the UK offered to cover the costs of doing so. They demanded much higher payments and still refused to guarantee to keep[ the plant running and not destroying the plant by refusing to feed the furnaces. .
While we have critical infrastructure owned by multiple nations.
We have never had a situation where that infer structure risks being destroyed and the companies have refused to work to keep it effective. Or by some (rational) interpretations attempting to destroy it.
Such a situation will naurally cincentrate initial anger on the nation acting.
Yeah, we are at fault for-ever allowing it. But the panic about china, perceived intent, is far from invalid.