Let’s flip that around: I’d be asking serious questions of a uranium business being associated with that clown.

Also, if I was BoJo’s missus, I’d want to see the WhatsApp messages he has been exchanging with Owen… 🤔

They claimed it was there to deter touts but they just ended up charging more.

Before the 1980s, stillborn babies were taken away from families who were not given any details of what happened to their babies or where they were buried.

Medical staff would tell bereaved parents their children would be buried alongside “a nice person” who was being buried that same day – often without giving them the opportunity to say goodbye.

Instead, the babies were interred in mass graves.

That’s rough.

There was also no central registry of stillbirths which makes tracking them down difficult. My grandfather always claimed to have been one of twins but his brother, Anthony, was stillborn. We don’t even know if he existed (although my grandfather’s younger brothers both had sons called Anthony, which wasn’t a family name before that), let alone where he ended up.

The management did, the band claim they didn’t.

Some people have said Oasis agreed to this, the band have released a statement saying they didn’t know about it, although their management and promoters did sign up to it “to help keep general ticket prices down as well as reduce touting”.

Weird would be a step up in my assessment of them. Also “weird” needn’t be a bad thing. I like weird. I"d vote for a weird party if given the option.

This makes the group the same size as Reform anf the DUP which is a solid start. The weird thing will be that some.of Labour’s fiercest opposition will come from MPs it got rid of.

It does feel a bit over-the-top. Hopefully, to lower expectations so the Budget won’t feel too awful but it could end up overshadowing any hopeful messages the Chancellor wants to throw in (and there will be some).

Not much we can do as it isn’t editorialised by OP, that’s all on the Torygraph.

We may want a list of sites for this community that are either black or grey listed but we also don’t want to overly restrict the sources used too much as you’d be in danger of groupthink and enforcing a more left-leaning mindset that doesn’t properly reflect the range of opinion amongst general British voters.

So I would black-list the Sun and Star, grey-list the Mail, Express and Telegraph as sources to be used sparingly. We’d probably also want to grey-list sources like The Morning Star, etc - we have !uk_leftists@feddit.uk for that kind of thing.

although they do at least get around paywalls better

That’s why I use them as there aren’t many paywalls they can’t get through.

I imagine if a Tory MP accidentally found themselves in an NHS A&E they might get bumped down the list.

“Thoughtless” and “repugnant” are used in the description on her passport.

So, no St. Bernards and I suspect capuchin monkeys are out.

All fine and dandy until the neighbours start complaining that the regulars are now smoking outside their houses which happen to be just outside the pub exclusion zone.

These are the kind of things that I imagine are giving constructional experts sleepless nights at the moment.

Just hypothetically, and I don’t want to get anyone riled up, but could Starmer get a dog in as a replacement?

Yes.

“No rational investor is going to put their money into water right now.”

Because they shouldn’t be making big profits out of it.

Hand the franchise back and at least if it is being run on a not-for-profit basis then we’ll know that they aren’t taking the piss because public confidence has been eroded by all the piss-taking.

no point in the food getting to you

They don’t do deliveries either and only take cash.

Larry the cat is a good judge of character.

Glad you like it, we are a silly nation sometimes.