• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Taking targeted action at those who perpetrated the sabotage would be my preference, rather than blanket bans on a protestors. This is the wrong way to solve the problem.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Agreed. But this isn’t a blanket ban on protestors.

      This specific organisation operates in cells, has caused and advocates for violence.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ok… …a blanket ban on a set of protestors.

        What’s the legal criteria to say somebody is a member of an organisation like this? Do they have to have a membership card to be banned from protests? It’s poorly defined and easily becomes anybody who turns up at a pro-palestinian protest. At that point you have banned protests on the subject.

        Hold individuals accountable for their actions. Don’t police people’s views or their desire to express them.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Proscription means it is an offence to belong to the organisation, invite or recklessly express support for them, arrange a meeting in their support, or wear clothing or carry articles which arouse reasonable suspicion that you are a member or supporter of the organisation.

          So under the law, waving a Palestinian flag is fine. Waving a Palestine Action banner is illegal.

          This amounts to a targeted action at the organisers and perpetrators of the incident, rather than wider supporters of Palestine.