Archive.today link

Some key excerpts:

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced Wednesday that transgender women are not permitted to use bathrooms in the Capitol that match their gender identity

The policy […] will also apply to bathrooms in House office buildings, changing rooms and locker rooms.

Johnson’s statement — which was made on Transgender Day of Remembrance, recognized annually to memorialize trans people who died due to anti-trans violence — comes days after Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced a bill to bar transgender women from facilities on Capitol Hill that match their gender identity, a response to the election earlier this month of Rep.-elect Sarah McBride (D-Del.).

McBride blasted Mace’s legislation earlier this week, calling it “a blatant attempt from far right-wing extremists to distract from the fact that they have no real solutions to what Americans are facing.”

Mace was threatening to force a vote on the matter prior to Johnson’s decision to formally announce the new policy; the congresswoman wanted the terms to be included in the rules package for the 119th Congress and said she would force a vote on the bill if that did not come to fruition.

  • millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Busloads of trans men showing up to use the bathroom would actually probably be a pretty effective means of activism for policies like these.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I agree, but that’s also asking members of a group Republicans are already trying to marginalize to make themselves a visible target.

      I’d love to see it, but fully understand and respect trans men not wanting to expose themselves to hatred.

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      This is brilliant. If someone like in there photo wanted to hold a sign saying “Mike Johnson wants me to use the women’s bathroom”, it would cause waves.

      Maybe a less aggressive message like, “I just want to use the mens bathroom, where I’m comfortable, but Mike Johnson won’t let me”. Because it focuses on people just wanting to be left alone to go to the bathroom in peace.

      Or, best yet, have a transman that lifts and looks like they can snap Mike Johnson like a toothpick–have that transman catch up with Mike Johnson in the hallway and ask him why he has to use the women’s bathroom. Instant viral.

      • SteevyT@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If someone like in there photo wanted to hold a sign saying “Mike Johnson wants me to use the women’s bathroom the same bathroom as your daughter”, it would cause waves.

        Using their own tactics against them with that little change.

        • Buttons@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah. It would be so satisfying.

          But in the long run in think engaging in this bogus cultural war issue only hurts trans people. They might try to stop them from using bathrooms at all or something crazy.

          That’s why I say de-escalating and sending a message of “I’m just a person that wants to mind my own business and be comfortable” might be better than a message of “your stupid and your policies don’t make sense”. Both are true, I don’t know which is more effective.