• ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It makes it obvious to people whether they are downloading Google Chrome as packaged by Google or as by someone else. That being said, Google Chrome is malware. That being said there is a lot more that needs to be done to truly prevent malware, which will be costly but will hopefully take effect when they’ve got the budget for it

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because if you search Firefox and see a badge that says verified, you can be confident that it was Mozilla that packaged it and added it to FlatHub as opposed to some random scammer.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Verification doesnt help at all if the source is not trusted. All this says is “upstream developers maintain this package”. Unofficial packages can be safe too, like VLC.

      • dsemy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It does help prevent actual malware from being downloaded, though, since upstream developers probably won’t publish malware on Flathub.

        But this is still a half-measure. I don’t understand why Red Hat and Canonical don’t treat this issue seriously; people on Linux are used to assuming software installed from the repos are safe, and yet Snap and Flatpak are being pushed more and more despite their main repositories being potentially unsafe.

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fedora has their own flatpak repo built from their own rpms and their own runtime. Flathub has more flatpaks though.

        • Billegh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Because both Red Hat and Canonical are of the “pay us to care” mindset. If you aren’t paying for support, you’re a freeloader and need to do your own research.