• filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I just wish the SD was a bit more powerful. Recently especially with those UE5 games we need to install some custom scripts just to make them playable and usually they don’t even look good. I love the Deck, but Steam should really update the APU.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Seems like the UE5 games can’t get steady framerates on most hardware, but I know what you mean.

      I’m definitely looking forward to steam deck 2, but I do appreciate that Valve isn’t pushing out a new one each year with slightly improved specs. And now that the nintendo switch 2 has about the same power as the steam deck, maybe we’ll see UE5 and some other engines actually try to run well at that performance level.

    • Kronusdark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Agreed. We don’t need it to perform like an RTX 5090 but just a smidge more power would get a ton of recent games into playable frame rates. I still don’t know how people play BG3 on the deck.

      • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve been playing rogue trader on mine recently, I’d describe as playable, but it’s night and day different going through moonlight (which yeah, obviously). Satisfactory was able to get 40-60 pretty reliably.

        How bad is bg3 on it?

        • Kronusdark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You can get around 30FPS but you have to deal with heavy FSR artifacting and it looks terrible.