☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
- 711 Posts
- 836 Comments
2·1 day agoI’ve been ollama, it can just pull striaght from the huggingface url
I mean the core of HarmonyOS is open source already https://www.openharmony.cn/
It’s understandable why they want to have control over the full hardware and software stack. You get a lot of benefits from optimizing the software specifically for the hardware you have. This also allows them to make the software leaner avoiding bloat and legacy cruft.
I do hope they open source the whole thing at some point.
Similarly, HarmonyOS has diverged from Android to the point of not being compatible either. It’s really its own thing now.
What part of the headline is misleading, do elaborate.
No, what makes them reactionary is the content of their comments.
What the video actually talks about is how AI tools can be used by humans to speed up the process of making games, but why actually watch the video before regurgitating reactionary comments.
gonna have to smuggle them through Mexico 🤣
They built their own HarmonyOS which was originally based on Android but now its become its own thing and no longer compatible with Android.
https://consumer.huawei.com/en/harmonyos/
the core of it is open source https://www.openharmony.cn/mainPlay
I’m guessing they did at least a minimal assessment of that. :)
Oh yeah, that could be pretty amazing. It would really be strictly superior to actually owning a scooter since you wouldn’t have to worry about having a parking space and stuff. This is also a great illustration of the direct benefits of collective ownership.
From what I’ve seen the driving culture in China does seem to be a lot more relaxed than in western countries. I’ve seen lots of videos of people driving scooters on sidewalks and so on. The legal responsibility is a good question, I would assume the company making the scooter would be responsible since they’re making the self driving system for it.
If this tech works well I can see it making things incredibly convenient. You could just leave your scooter somewhere, and then have it come find you, or you could even share a scooter with a friend this way.
The catch is in justifying spending the resources needed to take this from the lab to mass production. No company is willing to invest hundreds of billions that would be needed when they can keep squeezing a bit more performance out of silicon at a lower investment. That’s why this sort of stuff requires state level funding, and now that US is cutting China off from western chips, there’s a really big incentive to provide that sort of funding.
I’m simply amazed by your amazing and well argued counterpoint. Bravo champ.
So, the whole anti-AI movement is deeply reactionary as I explain in detail here https://lemmy.ml/post/29190434
I very much agree, the platforms have to be qualitatively different in nature to make it worth moving.
You don’t have to prove them since you can just try things and see what the results are. The paper acts as a solid basis of an approach that’s known to work.