Nobody ever polled better against Trump than Sanders.
Nobody ever polled better against Trump than Sanders.
Just in time for it to get reinstated.
It won’t be long before the internet is just bots talking to each other and advertisers paying them to do so.
I vividly remember the Digg migration and Reddit is so very much like Digg these days.
Mouse tits?
I’m 50 and really don’t watch movies almost at all any more. They tend to be so formulaic and too long to watch at home at night. If I’m going to watch something it will likely be episodic tv series. I do still play video games on the regular though.
I can’t imagine who would ever pay $700 to upgrade from a ps5 for this.
As much as I love seeing Trump get into hot water, how is this different than a TV station interviewing him?
It’s traceable but also possible to hide your identity, especially if you are a major criminal or government under sanctions. Especially when compared to the traditional finance system (in which they also tend to be pretty good at hiding their identities and transactions).
It’s a great platform for being able to transfer money that would otherwise be under sanctions and for storing criminal profits. And that’s probably what it will always be for.
The only way to get this rich is by exploiting others and almost definitely breaking laws. These people all have a screw loose somewhere.
Are these chips actually made in China or still made in Taiwan like most high performance chips?
The last 4 years were some of the best I’ve seen under any president in my lifetime so I wasn’t so concerned. I think a president is 99% who he surrounds himself with and his experience in pulling the levers of government (ie instincts), both of which were guaranteed to be far better than the alternative. If the dems lose because of this decision, it will surely be far worse for the country.
I agree. Best president since Carter. And I didn’t like him at all in the primaries.
It’s only a service if his replacement wins.
I dunno, they need to give something to centrists and independents to win. Kamala’s base is all totally united against trump already I think.
I hope you are right. Not fielding the incumbent is a mistake according to most people who have had good success of predicting elections.
I vote in a solidly blue state, so for about 20 years before the last election, I voted 3rd party generally as a protest to the platforms of the 2 parties, especially the drug war, mass incarceration, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and climate change.
Over time I think we’ve made considerable progress on these issues, and though we aren’t 100% where I want to be, I have no problem voting Biden in this and last election to show solidarity against Trump.
Even though I really disliked Biden last election I still voted against Trump and after seeing what he accomplished in his first term, which is probably more than any Democrat in my lifetime, I have no qualms about voting for him again. Obviously I don’t like his position on Israel, but it’s the same of every D in my lifetime, and when the alternative is a fascist USA which will likely lead to the loss of Europe also to fascism, I have to suck it up.
But to answer your question, yes I always consider the candidates. I have even registered R before to vote in their primary because I felt it meant more than voting in the D primary.
The polls disagree, no one ever polled better against Trump than Sanders.