Curious: what are the wrong things it had prioritised?
- 1 Post
- 23 Comments
nialv7@lemmy.worldto United Kingdom@feddit.uk•Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’English1·8 months agoWhy am I so cross? Because I am stripped my working people status by Starmer despite me working all my adult life and still can’t start buying a house, for putting a bit of my savings into stock, just so he can claim he “didn’t raise working people’s taxes”.
That’s just peak slimey politician behaviour.
Do I think people who own a lot of stocks and assets should be taxed. Hell yes, let’s tax those motherfuckers. But just don’t lie and stop twisting the definition of working people.
Edit: typo
nialv7@lemmy.worldto United Kingdom@feddit.uk•Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’English14·8 months agoRead the news please.
When asked by Sky News if someone who works but also gets income from shares or property is a working person, Starmer said “they wouldn’t come within my definition.”
nialv7@lemmy.worldto United Kingdom@feddit.uk•Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’English14·8 months agoI agree with you, but that’s not what Keir Starmer said. His spokesperson recanted it, but what he said originally was stupid.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto United Kingdom@feddit.uk•Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’English28·8 months agoThat’s not what Keir said originally, he said people who own any stock should be excluded from “working people”. Then people got (rightfully) mad and his spokesperson had to recant for him.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto United Kingdom@feddit.uk•Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’English210·8 months agoWhat are you talking about? This is exactly what Keir Starmer is saying and is what I am calling stupid.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto United Kingdom@feddit.uk•Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’English321·8 months agoOkay, so (hypothetically) I can be working for 50 hours a week to make ends meet. If I put any little savings I have from time to time into stock, I am not working people anymore? Just because I want to be financially responsible?
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•tension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctions81·8 months agoWhen Linus becomes entertaining is when he is not doing his job properly.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•tension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctions23·8 months agoThat’s why what Linus said was stupid when he brought WWII into this conversation…
Where should they move to? Countries that aren’t sanctioning Russia right now are likely to be… problematic? in other ways. But I am also pretty ignorant about which countries are in that list, and I would like to know more.
Maybe they need to become pirates on international water…
Not as much as living in Palestine or Ukraine.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Phoronix: Several Linux Kernel Driver Maintainers Removed Due To Their Association To Russia12·9 months agoIANAL, but I think the general answer is no. When someone contribute code to an open source project, although they aren’t giving up their copyright, they do grant the recipient (and the rest of the world, for that matter) a license to use their code. In case of Linux, this is the GNU Public License. Unless GPL has a section about license revocation that I am not aware of, you won’t be able to take your code back.
I see, thanks for explaining. So IIUC, rook is intended for headless systems?
But keepassxc already provides a secret service ootb?
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Attacking UNIX Systems via CUPS, Part I | CUPS Remote Code Execution1·9 months agoErrr I use mdns all the time…
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Ventoy source code contains some unknown BLOBs, still no word on the issue from the dev after months5·10 months agoWould be nice if the dev can respond and confirm that…
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Ventoy source code contains some unknown BLOBs, still no word on the issue from the dev after months18·10 months agoWhile this is true, it only requires the shim and grub to be copied for another distro.
From other comments there are a lot more blobs than just these two.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•This happens after 3-4 days of running the server, then I have to restart it manually.English208·11 months agoTime to add a cron job to auto reboot it once a day
Also Japan, South Korea and Taiwan in the blue tier… Don’t know what OP is on about.
Edit: lol didn’t realize i was on .ml