If it’s illegal to peacefully protest, then it’s time for violence against the oppressors.

I’m well out of it. I know

Will public officials be held responsible for supporting genocide?

Kill your oppressors. May not be legal, but a blade in the ribs of someone who supports genocide is morally justifiable.

So no lone wolf attacks on fascists have ever been inspiring by online shit posting? Let’s give it some time and see what the people come up with

So you’re no longer defending fascists against violent retribution by the people? Do you consider agents of a fascist regime (i.e. police) to be exempt from justified violent action by anti-fascists? Should police action in furtherance of fascist policies only be faced with peaceful protest, or is it morally justifiable to not be tolerant of intolerance, up to and including violence?

Whose arguing? I’m just having a spirited debate on the role violence has in balancing the power dynamic between the ruling class and the governed. I don’t believe that governments should have a monopoly on violence for achieving their goals and that the people have just as much a right, if not more, in using violence as a tool to prevent objective evils.

Following that line of thinking, it would make no sense for American revolutionaries to kill British soldiers, or for Palestinians to kill IDF, or for European resistance fighters to kill Nazi soldiers. Killing low level stormtroopers “just following orders” is the same as killing an occupying soldier “just following orders.” In both instances, you have low level individuals just going along with a status quo that leads to more victimization of innocents. Police who don’t want to become targets should either fight against oppressive tactics internally, or quit and deprive the force of manpower.

No one said YOU were a fascist, only that you give fascists cover by stating that the people need to deal peacefully with them. The UK is literally arresting and jailing people for speaking out against genocide and supporting freedom for Palestine and your solution is strong language and peaceful protest.

The only thing that stops government violence is populist violence. I’m sorry that offends your sensibilities, but I am absolutely in favor and supportive of violence being used against oppressors.

Lessons not learned in blood are soon forgotten. Show me a peaceful resistance that has resulted in lasting change. The greatest movements in the power dynamic between the ruling class and the governed always require violence.

Can’t. Disabled. I’m the type of people that the people you defend will liquidate first after your appeasement has run its course and they don’t have to pretend anymore.

I won’t argue that I don’t have violent fantasies. I 100% wake up every single morning and hope that I’m going to read a story about someone finally losing hope and fighting back against their oppressors.

Funny how you blame me for the UK collectively punishing its populace because of a few “bad actors” post that they think it’s morally permissible to kill fascists and authoritarian stooges. Instead of being mad at me for advocating that people fight for their freedoms, maybe you should be more angry with your government for taking them away and criminalizing opposition to genocide. Just a thought.

I’m suggesting justifiable homicide against authoritarians. One man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter. Killing an authoritarian pig stormtrooper is the same as killing a Nazi, slave owner, or a Russian/IDF soldier, all are morally justifiable.

“Just following orders” hasn’t been a valid defense since Nuremberg. If “following orders” was a valid defense, there would be a lot of camp guards who wouldn’t have been brought to justice after the war. All humans have agency to either victimize innocents or not. Police officers can choose to not be pigs the same way soldiers can choose to not be murderous Nazis.

Police who uphold authoritarian system by committers of genocide deserve a blade between the ribs.

Because the UK government has always been about protecting the right of white people to terrorize and murder people of color. Who has committed more terroristic acts during its existence, Hamas, or the UK?

UK government proscribes Palestinian support as terrorism, but not these far-right groups, because the UK government has always been a government primarily for white people’s right to kill people of color.

The UK government has committed more atrocities and terroristic acts than Hamas.

What an idiotic law approved by a moronic government.

Who has committed more terroristic acts in its existence, Hamas, or the UK government?

The UK won’t do anything to help Gaza because, like the US, their politicians are bought and paid for by Israel. Cowards and thieves the lot of them.

Another “democracy” shows itself for what it really is. Fascist UK government officials who back criminalizing support for Palestine deserve the most severe of punishments. UK ruling class are supporting terrorism and genocide.