• 1 Post
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle



  • Subsidizing production does not … from China anyways (eg. batteries).

    I’m asking why the EU isn’t subsudising their domestic EV industry and starting a competition in electric propulsion technology. That would benefit everyone, except maybe the oil lobby.

    one should disincentivize internal combustion vehicles by adding taxes to them

    Why not both? And preferrably better subsidies for public transport / cycles / footpaths, etc.

    avoid misusing words like “terrorist” because, when misused this way

    If killing a handful of people is terrorism, what would you call trying to kill the entire human race (along with thousands of random other species)? ‘Terrorist’ is, if anything, too mild a word to describe such filth.













  • This is a program dedicated to influencers, not reviewers.

    Corrected. Thanks!

    There are YouTube channels/instagrammers that exclusively review sponsored products.

    I don’t use instagram, and stick to the more reliable youtube channels. Didn’t know this was a thing.

    If Google believes that the outlet is legit, they give the review device for free without the sponsorship contract. When they talk good about the device they need to flag the post with #giftfromgoogle and #teampixel

    This feels like one of those stories where one person misleads another without technically lying.



  • The first problem is that Google is giving an incentive to influencers - who are supposed to be (more or less) impartia - to review their phone favourably compared to alternatives.

    The second problem is that, despite being one of the biggest companies in the world, they did this in the most obvious way possible. Now who will trust any positive review of their phone? Anyone with common sense, let alone the lawyers whom I suppose cleared this - should have told them not to do something so dumb.

    Edit: corrected reviewers to influencers, for the reasons explained below.