No. People who want the benefit of self housing without worrying about hardware will rent a vps or something simpler. The hard part of hardware isn’t the purchase, it’s the maintenance.

Also, why the separate router?

Bullshit DMCA abuse

Have you passed their captive portal before turning on the VPN?

No, they’ll just see the management summary that Firefox occupies less than 0.5% of their users’ marketshare and prioritize their budget accordingly.

If you use a third-party analytics service such as Google Analytics, as almost all serious parties do (with their nice dashboards and reports), then you’ll notice Firefox is severely underrepresented because the request never reaches Google

Wonder why they wouldn’t use OSM.

Also, Firefox is in a tough situation where they have to purposefully shoot themselves in the foot, because their builtin tracking protection means Firefox usually doesn’t show up in a lot of browser usage stats.

It’s alright. I use both their desktop backup service and B2 extensively. Their desktop client and web interface is very basic and a bit rough, you don’t buy their service for the well-developed UI. The service works as advertised though.

Please point out the actual transphobia? You can’t just use that word willy-nilly.

What a weird set of events. It’s not even clear what was actually used as infection method.

Depends on why you want to hide your server ip, what’s your use case? Is it to protect against DDOS?

Cloudflare is evil, but is there any other party you would trust to share everything with?

Don’t worry, it’s fine, there’s nothing inherently wrong with running stateful workload in a container.

You should really back that up with arguments as I don’t think a lot of people would agree with you.

Welp, this is the most left field KilledByGoogle entry yet.

I highly recommend reading the Github thread as this is not at all an accurate representation. These features you’re talking about are off by default. Removing them from the existing package is just breaking existing users. There’s already a report from a user who can’t access their passwords because yubikey support was suddenly removed. You don’t do that to users just because you suddenly develop an opinion as a package maintainer that you feel is important. There was no dialogue, no consideration and a very rude, dismissive attitude of Julian.

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10725

Fuck me, ten years already?

Not really it seems. Steam has raised it to the MAX_INT - 5, Fedora originally planned to do so to but held off after concerns from engineers that it could lead to situations where having too much mapped would lead to the kernel killing other processes to solve OOM situations so they settled on the number that has now also been adapted by Arch. At least, according to another Phoronix article.

Either you misunderstand or the person you are responding to is. If you retroactively add a license to the current state of the code (for example by committing a new LICENSE file and adding the new license to the top of each file), or course that applies to the entire state of that code as of that commit. What is more difficult is that earlier commits won’t have that license explicitly unless you rewrite git history to make that happen (which is possible but tedious).

You can always relicense code you own the rights to. You can even dual license it, or continue to use it commercially in terms contradicting the license you open sourced it as, as long as you have the permission of every contributor.

The idea that a license added would only apply to code added after the license change is very funny.

On a hard drive. No, not a motherboard connected to a hard drive, a hard drive by itself. Sprite is brilliant.