

Not a security issue, copyright/license issues.


Not a security issue, copyright/license issues.
In my experience, many Gnome apps make doing complex tasks pretty easy compared to third party apps. However, it is at the cost of customization and questions like “why can’t I do this???”
But in general, Gnome’s simple design works for me, most things feel clean and polished. I don’t need the vast majority of features offered.
In the cases where Gnome’s default aren’t powerful enough, often times the KDE equivalent isn’t good enough for me either despite offering more features and customization.
As an example, Gnome Text Editor vs Kwrite and Kate. GTS has the basics I need like line numbers (Apple’s text editor does not have this…) and that fits 80% of my needs. But what about more advanced things? Well, no markdown support but I don’t think Kate has that either. What about coding? I’d rather use a dedicated IDE than Kate or GTS.
The bar is meant to be very minimal and not distracting.
It takes up space, sure, but it’s close to the minimal height while still having easily readable time up top


No, it’s a limitation with swaybg so they created a tool that doesn’t have that limitation.


Sideloading or preinstalling?
Sideloading already existed, but only for ostree flatpaks. Flatpak also supports OCI flatpaks, but the support for those aren’t as good, hence the previously missing side loading support.


“We do <thing > because we always did before <thing 2>” is not a good point
I didn’t mean it in a “this is better way”. I’m just saying that Wayland was designed around the idea of client side decorations, not server side decorations. Gnome has stuck to the more purist vision of Wayland, which makes sense since I believe they were its biggest proponent.


That can be dropped eventually too. Compositors like Niri don’t implement Xwayland support directly, and instead use Xwayland Satellite.


The for argument is basically the following


I hope the performance significantly improves by then. Beta 1 felt pretty rough to me. And also, animations.
The main reason I hear is that it maximizes screen usage and helps avoid/limit the tediousness of having to manage windows.
Not what you’re asking for, but I’ll give you my perspective as someone who’s tried tiling on and off and overall don’t like it.
Cosmic is exciting in this regard since it aims to be a fully-featured floating and tiling environment. You could just toggle between them as necessary (or have them on separate workplaces). You also get much better portal support.


As it stands today, sudo-rs is the default sudo implementation on Ubuntu 25.10, and uutils’ coreutils has mostly replaced the GNU implementation, with a few exceptions, many of which will be resolved by releases in the coming weeks. These diversions back to the existing implementations demonstrate that stability and resilience are more important than “hype” in our approach: I expect us to have completed the migration during the next cycle, but not before the tools are ready.


Yes. They also reverted some of the still unfinished stuff to use the Gnu versions until the Rust versions are ready.


True, but my issue with OpenBSD is that the performance is really lacking in terms of desktop smoothness. It feels like sub 60 fps compared the smoothness of Linux and FreeBSD.
I hope it’s just a current driver incompatibility and not related to their hardening. Will try again once 7.8 releases.


Maybe Secureblue?
That also comes with its own hardened browser based on GrapheneOS’s.
And if you don’t go with Secureblue and its browser, I’d recommend using a browser Chromium based, probably Brave. I know that’s a controversial choice, but in terms of security and ad blocking, it’s one of the better options. And disable JIT for V8.
You can tinker for the most part, it’s just done differently. In the Universal Blue world, that would be creating your own OCI container using their image template or blue build.
The nice thing is that it makes the OS much more reproducible than imperative commands and scripts.