If I recall correctly it’s important to be running ECC memory right?

Otherwise corrupter bites/data can cause file system issues or loss.

Static files as in static file handling in a web server no CGI, modules, server side code required.

What about good ole Big Top Beer at my local Raytown market

Not sure. Like any field I suspect there’s specialties including people who do research/modeling vs consuming that data and advising based on it.

Code and snippets to analyze data work well when you can send chunks of it to multiple servers (think analyzing the effect of weather patterns).

Since a lot of that stuff is running on Linux (similar to cloud computing) it makes sense that people that write function/scripts/utilities would already be comfortable in that environment and use it as their daily driver.

Possible something on your motherboard has PCIe lanes that are dedicated to GPU when it’s slotted, otherwise they can be used for other devices?

For example here’s a post about m.2 slots that, when used, affect the PCI on a particular board. May be worth checking your boards manual to see if there’s something similar.

https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/questions-about-a-mb-im-looking-at-asrock-z790-pg-riptide.3787003/

The answer not only seemed a HUGE disappointment, but a bit baffling. The pdf manual says if you occupy that 5th m.2 slot, which is the Gen 5 one, the Pci-E 1 slot is automatically downgraded to 8x. This I thought would be unacceptable if running a behemoth like the RTX 4090 I eventually plan to get, as it requires a lot of power and bandwidth.

I guess the trouble is that you don’t want to read the volumes where the db files are because they’re not guaranteed to be consistent at a given point in time right?

Does the given engine support a backup method/utility that can be used to copy files to some volume on a set schedule?

Exactly. At the end of the day there’s nothing being transmitted with OTP and using a standard app isn’t an issue.

Makes sense. And if it’s not relative to the content you just put decorative only right?

So…

Welcome to Firefox ([Logo for Firefox] marked as decorative)

vs

Our sponsors are [Logo for Microsoft] [Logo for Firefox] [Logo for Google]

It’s a neat option but the example proof of concept alt text “The Firefox logo”, as I understand it, it isn’t ideal for describing the image.

Maybe something like this?

The Firefox logo which consists of a Fox wrapped around a sphere

I assume they’re past some operational limit. But as long as you have redundancy that’s a risk I’d take for the capacity

Lesson learned from the whole XZ thing. Anything related to security does run the risk of nation state actors abusing trust. Makes it hard to do right

There’s a reason that stuff is ideally on its own separate vlan to isolate it as much as possible from the network too