Me too Maestro, me too. Not too late yet, but no clear route either sadly

I told you so rings hollow sadly. Brexiteers have no real answers, but LINO aren’t going to reverse, and nor will Reform. The case for an independent Scotland in the EU growing stronger every year

They can still ballot I believe

Their union should be balloting for strike action at this work. Some might be ashamed, but clearly not enough of them

They also pissed off a lot of contributors and community members. Tenacity for me!

Ardour is milea ahead on all that anyway. Tenacity is a simple multi-channel recorder. That’s all it needs to be

Tenacity has replaced this years ago. Fuck around, find out!

Marr ain’t wrong, but damn does Starmer need to fuck right off

This is a money game, how much are you willing to invest?

Who would have guessed that career politicians who couldn’t get on in the Tories, the most racist and right wing party in the UK in decades and desperate to hold onto candidates, might have trouble getting on with themselves? It’s almost as if we shouldn’t let limited companies pretend to be political parties

You might be able to do mac address cloning for fiber ports, if you have openwrt or similar it usually offers it.

A firewall may not offer full routing and NAT though for ipv4 devices, or wifi if you need it, or ipv6, or many other features. I’ve also used a cable modem and stuck the router in the dmz which essentially makes it a passthrough device also in the past

Basically, play with it and good luck!

Labour have been authoritarian and anti-freedom for many many years. ID cards were Blairites dream for years, but the Lords threatened to rebel every time. Section 44 anti-terror legislation was under Brown, and is still a shit-show. RIPA also a Blair act. And now this

Labour are not champions of freedom

But the shopkeeper can check your ID, and could remember your name and face. How do you propose doing that instead online? Because like it or not, the UK government were elected to do this

And yet, if you read act: there is a reasonable argument within the legislation. And the article posted mentions it too, from the architect. So you are correct in the fact the size of the site matters not. But if you are reasonably not about questionable matetial, you are likely exempt. Which is essentially what wikipedia are testing. So call it an overreach all you want; but this is yet to be proven

An interesting test case. Wikipedia contains vast amounts of information about harmful items, and children will use it. Ultimately libraries don’t restrict lending and so I suspect the article here illustrates that they shall emerge victorious

I agree. But I suspect most small forums are still exempt reading this article and the law. If you don’t have potential to cause harm (no porn essentially) you don’t need to do anything. But this has yet to be tested in a court to set any case law yet and so forums are understandably being very cautious

Doesn’t sound like a Labour government to me

Starmer loves a middle class bribe instead of sorting the fucking economy

And how about those zonal pricing reforms Ed? Don’t talk to me about betrayal

Good. Next the incest shit please