That’s just what they want you to think.
That’s just what they want you to think.
Amazon are also dicks about sick leave. I’m sure forcing people to work, and work hard, when they’re ill leads to complications.
deleted by creator
Honestly, if you’re sharing office files you’re probably using office 365. This means everything is a web app first and therefore Linux compatible.
I tried using the desktop version of word on a Mac last week, and the latency was so bad on a shared document that I had to switch to the web app anyway.
Basically, if you just want to use Linux you’ll be fine. If instead you don’t want to use Microsoft, you’ll probably have lots of problems.
Microsoft have been brutally effective in getting their tentacles into academic institutes, and you’ll find that everything from email to logging into internal sites relies on an office 365 account.
I wish. Ai is much shitter than that. Current AI (basically everyone means an LLM when they say AI) is just repeating plausible bullshit without fact checking.
It’s Boris Johnson on an industrial scale.
His nanny.
Mommy was too busy so they had to pay someone to spend time with him.
Brexit means Brexit Russian interference.
That line about competent bastards is running right through the Tory party at the moment.
Saatchi - former party chairman and the guy who came up with “labour isn’t working” has been saying the same thing.
It’s interesting that their response to this is always “we should be more competent” and never “we should stop being bastards”.
I mean the big problem is how the labour party will whip.
PR is a significant issue, that changes how much power a party will have in the future. If PR goes through, it’s quite likely that no party will ever have enough MPs to rule without support of another party. It’s also likely to lead to the larger parties splitting into different factions. Because of this, the labour leadership are going to have strong opinions about it, and if they don’t support it, they will probably force their MPs to oppose it by using the party whips.
There’s one thing it will do, and that’s decrease legitimacy of the current system. If Labour get a supermajority and end up with 70% of the seats on 45% of the vote, it makes it very obvious that first past the post isn’t working. With that and what’s likely to be every other party calling for voting reform, it does make a cross party consensus on voting reform more likely.
There’s basically a hierarchy in political decision making.
1 should be the reason you get into politics in the first place because you want to make the world a better place. 2 is also super important, we live in a democracy and if you don’t give people some of what they want you’re not doing your job. 3 is basically day to day politicking. You throw red meat to members of the party so they continue to support you.
The Tory party is now so up their own arses that they only do 3 in the hope that they won’t tear themselves apart. This is some random anti-woke bullshit, that will mean it’s harder to catch and prevent child abuse, and kids can’t learn basic biology. And it doesn’t even appeal to what’s left of their fanbase.
It’s very true on a Mac. Almost every time you click the green button, it jumps to full screen and then you can’t drag another window on top of it.
It’s a pain in the arse because my workflow is to have a reading screen with documents and emails on, and a work screen with whatever I’m actually doing. But if outlook is full screen, you can’t drag any other windows on top of it.
Don’t know why the first guy was saying this is a Windows thing though. I only run onto it on macs.
I think that’s a myth.
If spoiled ballots “win” nothing happens and the person with the most votes is elected anyway.
There’s no way to tell the difference between accidentally spoiling a ballot and a protest vote, so they just don’t mean anything.
If you’re hoping that politicians will feel enough shame to step down if no one votes for them, then I’d like to introduce you to our last two prime ministers.
It’s probably easiest to ignore what lib Dems say because they’re don’t have to put out a coherent policy platform, because no one expects them to be in power.
Instead look at the seats they want to win. Their plan has always been to mop up Tory votes in places that can’t bring themselves to vote labour.
It puts them firmly in the middle between the torries and labour. It’s also why e.g. they played down rejoining the EU at the last election. It might be their official stance, but it doesn’t play well in the rural Tory seats they’re targeting.