Thanks, I’ve long lacked the motivation to switch to KeePassXC. Now there’s nothing keeping me on Bitwarden anymore. Canceled my annual subscription.
Thanks, I’ve long lacked the motivation to switch to KeePassXC. Now there’s nothing keeping me on Bitwarden anymore. Canceled my annual subscription.
Keyguard is not open-source, only source-available.
Desktop Bitwarden app is not open-source anymore.
It’s okay. People can have a different point of view, I have no problem with that.
There can only be one.
Also, the Ventoy fanbois are pretty insufferable, and they tend to brigade anyone that speaks ill of Ventoy or its dev.
I more often see a different picture, where any mention of Ventoy leads to unreasonable agression and screams about how storing multiple ISOs on the same disk is useless.
Oops, a typo. Thanks.
Every time an open-source cloud gallery like Ente or PhotoPrism is mentioned, someone is sure to come along and talk about Immich.
I mean, Immich is cool, yeah, but it definetly is not a gold standard or something. Ente is a much more finished product.
I am a former openSUSE user, so my alias is:
dup
. It just refers to ujust-update
, as Aurora is my current daily-driver.
VanillaOS is very promising, but it has Gnome as the only DE option unfortunately.
Kind of, yes.
Creative Commons licenses aren’t suitable for software and applying them like that is an extremely bad behaviour.
We should probably stop arguing about Matrix vs XMPP and finally decide what to use or else we’ll never move forward.
I wonder if more Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite-related code was merged.
Aurora is cool, if you’re okay with using an immutable distro. It is Fedora Atomic-based with KDE on top, so it is stable, but relevant. All necessary drivers are set up out of the box, but less pre-installed apps than Bazzite.
While your post is just: it doesn’t work on my computer, so Linux is bad for a normal user.
No, KDE connect has a very different purpose.
Jokes aside, I find that attitude not very healthy.
Calling a source-available license “not proprietary”, this is what not very healthy.
“Source-first” or “fair code” are just a fancy ways to say “proprietary”.
At first glance it looks like yet another organization like Ethical Source or FUTO, attempting to flip the definition of open-source with their proprietary (source-available) dogmas. I hope that I am wrong.