Have to use an NTFS formatted drive to take a DCP master of a film to a cinema for a test screening. The cinema says they need NTFS. I somewhat doubt that’s really the case but one never knows what oddities might surprisingly be the case for obscure hardware like cinema servers. I used a windows computer I could access in the end because I couldn’t figure out how to get this to work but I was trying to acquire the capability for future such cases so I wouldn’t need to do that next time.

I did see someone else suggest this. I guess it sounds a bit timid but the idea kind of freaked me out. I’d feel ok doing this on a desktop PC but I feel like trying to boot from a USB drive on a Mac is going to run in to all kinds of headaches and nasty surprises and I’m worried I could brick a very expensive piece of machinery. I guess this particular fear is what people are talking about when they say they don’t feel like they really own their computer unless they’re using linux. Maybe I’m worrying about nothing, is there anything to it other than plugging in a usb and starting up the machine?

It does seem like it’d be pretty cool, though much rather them than me lol. I think shoving an rpi inside though would really betray the implicit spirit of the project. That would just be “can a raspberry pi run linux when I put in a plastic case shaped like a children’s toy?” The answer would pretty obviously be yes. People are saying the processor in it means it probably couldn’t run Linux which would make it a bit of a non-starter but there apparently other OSs that could be made to run on that kind of processor and that’d be cool to see.

must have been an awkward thing to ask someone who’s never heard of them, using the correct terminology.

The malware also uses advanced evasion techniques, such as suspending its activity when it detects a new user in the btmp or utmp files and terminating any competing malware to maintain control over the infected system.

So, is it a fairly decent antivirus mixed in with all the malware?

I guess if, as this person says, the intended use is made clear then presumably so long as the original logs from which the report was generated are retained then there shouldn’t really be an issue. Make your nice, digestible reports that normalise over a workday and give a more grand overview of progress, and if they smell a bit too rosy or you just sometimes need a more granular accounting of time then clients/bosses can request the original raw data from the contractor/employee. Maybe this software itself should include some ability to retain a log of the processing that was done so that the relationship between its generated reports and the source data can be more clearly audited if some kind of a trust issue arises.

The hope I guess would be that you make it clear that this is a more executive summary style of report that you’ve added as a courtesy because it’s more useful in context and that’s hopefully enough for whoever you’re reporting to but if they want more transparency or detail it’s all there for them too.

I don’t have an iPhone, though I understand the shortcuts of Mac os are supposed to be compatible with iOS so maybe there’s a possibility the instructions could work on my Mac. I don’t want to convert the images though just strip that metadata.

The other thing is, I kind of want to do it this way because there’s something of an ulterior motive here where I want to learn to make simple applications and buttons that work with various command line apps I use frequently on my computer, like a crude form of home made GUI. I find that there are often such apps where I only use one or two commands and use just often enough to need an easier way but infrequently enough not to remember the syntax of what to type.

no it’s very easy to modify. I just wanted not to have to open up terminal and try and remember what the commands were every time I upload something to the internet

I think it will connect just fine, it’s just that the device was made before Apple Silicone existed so I’m unsure if it will continue to do it’s job on a current version of Mac os

What? Why?

I’ve read that masks do not actually thwart these systems.

Didn’t know they’d taken out the storage drives but I was aware despite my general ignorance that it’s not turnkey ready to go. I guess what I’m wondering is, is there any part of the of the process involved in designing and building such a supercomputing cluster that is already taken care by buying it in the manner that it has been sold and could that in any way offset the increased costs of trying to bring such a cluster online rather than starting from scratch? I’m not saying it is the case, so much as wondering aloud for anyone with expertise to chime in, to see if that’s a way it could make sense.

I understand there’s a mountain to climb to bring this thing in to a usable state for anyone, but could it maybe get you to base camp more quickly?

Does the hardware being all so arranged as it is in this manner to create a supercomputer make any difference to that evaluation? Like does the work of putting all the outdated hardware together in the complex way needed to make it functional for supercomputing make it potentially cheaper than buying more modern hardware but having to build it all yourself?

Aww I was just about gush about how awesome they’ve been all these years. Guess I haven’t really kept up to date. I mean it doesn’t sound like it’s gone totally to shit, but just clearly embarking on a path straight in to the shit

Well I mean what did you just read? He already said those are the facts bro.