You might wanna try out Pale Moon. It’s optimized for single-thread performance and takes up a bit less memory.

It’s quite independent from Wikidata. It’s an alpha-stage programming functions repository.

Somehow, it feels horrifying to use something that high-level for the backend, especially when MediaWiki has so much PHP and the WMF has so many PHP programmers. Maybe my adolescent arse is getting old…

Wikifunctions finally exposed running functions via API in March, though yeah, it’s still a long, long way from being integrated in wikis, not to mention the arcane parameter that is passing a JSON via URL. (and hopefully you meant Wikifunctions and not Wikidata lol)

because for some reason, torvalds is bad now because he is a capitalist while nearly everyone is a capitalist. that’s the argument made.

I’m done explaining.

(Internet slang, derogatory) An effeminate or unmasculine man.

A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]

soy boy

Dubliette is referring to the thought-terminating cliché that every major US party doesn’t want to abolish capitalism (the economic system centered around capital, private ownership, etc.), ergo we’re all liberals.

Freeze peach doesn’t mean you can call people "fag"s. By using that word you’re 1. insulting those who express their gender as they wish 2. calling us names

Also, my point is that there is precedent for laws to geopolitcally restrict open source. I agree that there is a real security issue.

I didn’t link to that!

How is this a conspiracy theory‽

why the fuck are we using that word here? just read the article yourself, “auteur de war” sans nees

I’m giving an example of sanctions applying to software.

Some old folk are reminded of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_States

Yeah. Why is everyone saying this is removing their contribution credits? It’s just a list of active maintainers…

📎<[It appears that you have double posted. Would you like help?]

deleted by creator

I wouldn’t get involved in a legal battle myself